Shkrimtarja Flutura Açka ka denoncuar një libër në shqip, që i mëson myslimanët se si duhet të bëhen terroristë.
Titulli i librit është “Dhjetë përgjigje për një jomysliman”.
“Ne mes te Parisit vriten barbarisht njerez, ndersa ne mes te Tiranes shiten libra te ketij lloji”, shkruan shkrimtarja.
Nuk është çudi që ky libër të gjendet edhe në Panarin e Librit që është duke u mbajtur akualisht në Tiranë.
Ku jetojme o milet??!!Qe kur thuhet feja e shqiptarit eshte shqiptaria vari k…..
Nese eshte e vertete, autori i ketij Libri duhet te gjykohet sa me shpejt te jete e mundur…Eshte skandaloze…
natyrisht te vjen keq per çfare po ndodh ne shqiperi.atje mbreteron sovrane
injoranca ! dhe politikanet edhe pas 25 vitesh meren vetem me ndarje trofeshe.
besoj se eshte momenti qe qeveria Rama te filloje e te vere pikat mbi i te shumta shqiptare.sidomos kjo fetare.qe eshte si nje zgjim i keq,pas nje enderre
inkube ! te mos presin qe te ndodhe gjema dhe pastaj te bejne sikur u vjen keq.
njethundraket islamike shqipfoles nuk kane asnje ndryshim nga gjaxoret muslims te ISIS-it…………………Zikeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee dylberi!
tfgs TE KA shk…dhy TURKU TY
BASHKE ME KATRAGJYSHEN TENDE
JEVGE, ptu race muti, te vjen era qen
zgjebarak, na e ndote forumin o
qennnn halesh, vetem karlliqe
shkruan o pederast azie, dylber buzuqesh, sumgris egjypti ptuu
BEQIRAAAAAAAAA SUNITE,urrejtia juaj ndaj nje kristiani tregon fytiren tuaj gjaxore,ADN turkoshake duke vertetuar me se miri thenien magjike se:
”…..po te gervishesh sado pak nje myslimon shqipfoles ,do te zbulosh arabin qe ai fsheh mes veti……..”
Por mos harroni mor te pabese cnjerzore se urrejtia juaj na rrit ”erdoganin” disa cm…………….
?????
te ka ngelur sahati 8 otfg1 qe te qifshin ata te issit ore gamioli
Po janulla sa ndrushim ka nga mjekrroshat islamist!? https://www.facebook.com/Moroccan.without.Religion/videos/445406695651714/?fref=nf
tfgs……nuk e kuptoj se si nje njeri mund te jet kaq idjot,shpirt zi,i degjeneruar si ty!!!!? Kam vene re qe komenton gjithshka duke vjell vrer.ti je tipiku i gjese (se njeri nuk je) 300 kilshe,qe rri gjith diten perpara kompjuterit duke ngrene e duke e vjell te gjith ate qe ha ne komente idjote te cilat jane pa dinjitet dhe pa mendim,thjesht rradhitje fjalesh pa rend.do ishte me mire per ty dhe per gjithe njerezimin te vrisje veten.
Bravo, kjo eshte interesante,
Duhet censure per cfare plehrash hedhim ne treg..
Ne panairin e librit????!!!kjo eshte sec eshte…
te gjendet autori ,ti varet nji kg dinamit ne qafe dhe ta hedhin nga aeroplani !
Nuk kuptuam, c’fare shkruhet, a nuk e shikon qe nuk lexohet gje, te pakten shkruaje dhe vendose faqen e librit si foto!
E pabesueshme!!!
na e tregoni pak kush shtepi botuese e ke?? te hapim padi penale edhe ta fusin brenda
Edhe të varfër edhe terroristë. Hajde Hajde ku po shkon Bota.
E keqja vjen nga Kurani. Ai eshte” Mein Kampfi” i islamikeve.
Jooooo, jo, nuk vjen e keqja nga Kurani, kjo vjen nga politikat kriminale te atyre qe duan te fshihen pas Islamit dhe t’ua hedhin myslimaneve. Ne Kuran nuk thuhet “vri” e as “pri”, aty thuhet se kush vret nje njeri, ka vrare te gjithe njerezimin.
Kurani ben thirrje per xhihad.
Ai nuk pranon asnje fé tjeter.
Per rrjedhoje ai eshte agresiv dhe ndjell urrejtje…
Ne cdo cep te internetit vetem kete sure lexon. Jeni kap mbas saj si dhelpra mbas koqeve te dashit, por edhe koqet e dashit do keputen nje dite. Do sura ti me vrasje dhe percarje, Ja te sjell une suren 9 vargu 23 dhe vargu 24. Nese do te tjera te sjell une sa te duash.
[9:23] O ju që besoni, mos e shoqëroni veten madje as me prindërit tuaj dhe vëllezërit tuaj, nëse parapëlqejnë mosbesimin mbi besimin. Ata mes jush që e shoqërojnë veten me ta janë duke bërë shkelje.
[9:24] Deklaroni: “Nëse prindërit tuaj, fëmijët tuaj, vëllezërit tuaj, bashkëshortet tuaja, familja juaj, paratë që i keni fituar, ndonjë punë për të cilën brengoseni, dhe shtëpitë që i gëzoni janë më të dashura për ju se Zoti dhe i dërguari i Tij,** dhe përpjekja për Të, atëherë pritni derisa Zoti ta sjellë gjykimin e Tij.” Zoti nuk i udhëzon njerëzit shpirtligj.
Jo nga kurani nuk vien kurre e keqia, , por keta njerze qe benne kso sende jon njerzit te smure paranojak dhe duhet me i none e me tredhe para se mi kalle me bénin, se keta njerz e kane nuk duhet te thiren ne emere te zotit po keta thiren ne emere te dilli…..
Kurani ben thirrje per xhihad.
Ai nuk pranon asnje fé tjeter.
Per rrjedhoje ai eshte agresiv dhe ndjell urrejtje…
Moj vajze/zonje,kryqezatat kush i beri QUR’ANI.ne kohen qe zbriti QUR’ANI mekka u cliru vetem me paqe.
Po ti s`na the, para kryqetareve si vajten myslimanet ne Jeruzalem?
Apo historia fillon aty ku doni ju?
Feja juaj u perhap me tehun e shpates.
O VLLAZEN SHQIPTAR HIQJUNI KURANIT SE JU EKINI ORIGJIN TUEJ KENI FEN E SPARVE SUEJ> E SKENI NEVOJE PERTU PERDOR ANMIKU I CILI MIRE E DINI SE AJE UKA KONVERTUA NE AT KURAN,QE SOT PO I EDUKON EDHE KUDRA ZOTIT,TYE I VRA NJERZIT E PAFAJSHEM.BIBLA JON FLET E sPJEGOHET ne GJUHEN TON AMTARE SE KATOLIKIZMI SHQIPTAR ASHT E LIDHUR ME ORIGJIN TON ILIRE,NDERSA KURANI AHTE I LIDHUR NGA ORIGJIA ARABE DHE SPJEGOHET NE GJUHEN ARABE< ATEHER AJ QE PRON OKUPIMI ASHT OKUPATOR I VETVETIT,
O Tom ik ha përshesh! Këtu e gjete për të bësh propagandë për fetë. Je i lirë të besosh çfarë të duash po mos fut hundët te punët e të tjerëve. Besimi është zgjedhje individuale, s’do të pyesim ty të zgjuarin për këto punë.
Numerimi ka filluar mbrapsht…Civilizimet po shkojne drejt perplasjes fatale …Terrorizmi islamik si pjelle e pashmangshme e nje “besimi” okult ,te urrejtjes dhe erresires, ka marre revansh drejt fundit te vet…Por deri sa te kape fundin , do kete shume viktima te pafajshme dhe shume kombe do humbasin…Shqiptaret jane ne emergjence kombetare dhe historike qe te pozicionohen qarte dhe perfundimisht si europiane…Per ne nuk do te kete “here tjeter”, dhe koncepti “neser”, nuk do ekzistoje per ne dhe shume si ne…Te keqen e kemi brenda nesh, e cila eshte gati te na shperbeje dhe te na ktheje ne “ushqim” per “hijenat” qe presin te jargavitura…”Popuj, jini vigjilente”….Shqiptare, solidarizohuni me fatkeqesine boterore franceze…jini vigjilente ku vini kemben, denonconi helmin vellavrases qe perhapet nga objektet e kultit, …mbroni identitetin europian kudo qe te jeni…Vetem keshtu behemi pjese e mrekullise se mistershme te ZOTIT, i cili e do dhe e mbron nga djalli popullin e TIJ, deri ne fund te kesaj bote…
Llahtar. Të hetohet. S’ka tolerancë me këto budallallëqe
te merren masa.Te denohet autori.,shtepia botuese biles edhe redaktori.Te shihet kush i porosit keto libra?ndonje shkolle fetare myslimane?.Te cfarosen .
Mos keni pare gje pelenazgane apo zigur k.rin me shoke????
Ata qe nuk rine dite pa komentuar kane dy dite qe jane zhdukur.
Dhe ju politikane shqiptar ,per te fituar sa me shume vota ,po i beni shume leshime institucioneve fetare si ne Shqiperi ashtu edhe ne Kosove.Nuk doni tja dini se ku e shpie shoqerine ky leshim i madh ndaj klerit.Neper shkolla femrat mbulohen,po gra te mbuluara futen ne parlament apo bashki.Gjithcka eshte politizuar.Nuk ka mbetur asgje jashte politikes:drejtesia,shkolla,ushtria.Nuk mjafton kjo e keqe qe e ka bllokuar jeten tone te perditeshme por politika i hap rrugen cfrenuese fese per interesat e saj .Mblidhni mendjen sepse sado pasuri te grumbulloni do te vije nje moment dhe do ta kuptoni se te jesh i pasur eshte shume pak.Dhe ne fund nje tjeter keshille.Mos e ktheni Shqiperine ne nje xhami te madhe edhe kur ato i ofrojne te tjeret.
DRONES ARE A TOOL, not a policy.
The policy is assassination.
While every president since Gerald Ford has upheld an executive order banning assassinations by U.S. personnel, Congress has avoided legislating the issue or even defining the word “assassination.” This has allowed proponents of the drone wars to rebrand assassinations with more palatable characterizations, such as the term du jour, “targeted killings.”
When the Obama administration has discussed drone strikes publicly, it has offered assurances that such operations are a more precise alternative to boots on the ground and are authorized only when an “imminent” threat is present and there is “near certainty” that the intended target will be eliminated. Those terms, however, appear to have been bluntly redefined to bear almost no resemblance to their commonly understood meanings.
The first drone strike outside of a declared war zone was conducted more than 12 years ago, yet it was not until May 2013 that the White House released a set of standards and procedures for conducting such strikes. Those guidelines offered little specificity, asserting that the U.S. would only conduct a lethal strike outside of an “area of active hostilities” if a target represents a “continuing, imminent threat to U.S. persons,” without providing any sense of the internal process used to determine whether a suspect should be killed without being indicted or tried. The implicit message on drone strikes from the Obama administration has been one of trust, but don’t verify.
The Intercept has obtained a cache of secret slides that provides a window into the inner workings of the U.S. military’s kill/capture operations at a key time in the evolution of the drone wars — between 2011 and 2013. The documents, which also outline the internal views of special operations forces on the shortcomings and flaws of the drone program, were provided by a source within the intelligence community who worked on the types of operations and programs described in the slides. The Intercept granted the source’s request for anonymity because the materials are classified and because the U.S. government has engaged in aggressive prosecution of whistleblowers. The stories in this series will refer to the source as “the source.”
The source said he decided to provide these documents to The Intercept because he believes the public has a right to understand the process by which people are placed on kill lists and ultimately assassinated on orders from the highest echelons of the U.S. government. “This outrageous explosion of watchlisting — of monitoring people and racking and stacking them on lists, assigning them numbers, assigning them ‘baseball cards,’ assigning them death sentences without notice, on a worldwide battlefield — it was, from the very first instance, wrong,” the source said.
“We’re allowing this to happen. And by ‘we,’ I mean every American citizen who has access to this information now, but continues to do nothing about it.”
The Pentagon, White House, and Special Operations Command all declined to comment. A Defense Department spokesperson said, “We don’t comment on the details of classified reports.”
The CIA and the U.S. military’s Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) operate parallel drone-based assassination programs, and the secret documents should be viewed in the context of an intense internal turf war over which entity should have supremacy in those operations. Two sets of slides focus on the military’s high-value targeting campaign in Somalia and Yemen as it existed between 2011 and 2013, specifically the operations of a secretive unit, Task Force 48-4.
Additional documents on high-value kill/capture operations in Afghanistan buttress previous accounts of how the Obama administration masks the true number of civilians killed in drone strikes by categorizing unidentified people killed in a strike as enemies, even if they were not the intended targets. The slides also paint a picture of a campaign in Afghanistan aimed not only at eliminating al Qaeda and Taliban operatives, but also at taking out members of other local armed groups.
One top-secret document shows how the terror “watchlist” appears in the terminals of personnel conducting drone operations, linking unique codes associated with cellphone SIM cards and handsets to specific individuals in order to geolocate them.
A top-secret document shows how the watchlist looks on internal systems used by drone operators.
The costs to intelligence gathering when suspected terrorists are killed rather than captured are outlined in the slides pertaining to Yemen and Somalia, which are part of a 2013 study conducted by a Pentagon entity, the Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Task Force. The ISR study lamented the limitations of the drone program, arguing for more advanced drones and other surveillance aircraft and the expanded use of naval vessels to extend the reach of surveillance operations necessary for targeted strikes. It also contemplated the establishment of new “politically challenging” airfields and recommended capturing and interrogating more suspected terrorists rather than killing them in drone strikes.
The ISR Task Force at the time was under the control of Michael Vickers, the undersecretary of defense for intelligence. Vickers, a fierce proponent of drone strikes and a legendary paramilitary figure, had long pushed for a significant increase in the military’s use of special operations forces. The ISR Task Force is viewed by key lawmakers as an advocate for more surveillance platforms like drones.
The ISR study also reveals new details about the case of a British citizen, Bilal el-Berjawi, who was stripped of his citizenship before being killed in a U.S. drone strike in 2012. British and American intelligence had Berjawi under surveillance for several years as he traveled back and forth between the U.K. and East Africa, yet did not capture him. Instead, the U.S. hunted him down and killed him in Somalia.
Taken together, the secret documents lead to the conclusion that Washington’s 14-year high-value targeting campaign suffers from an overreliance on signals intelligence, an apparently incalculable civilian toll, and — due to a preference for assassination rather than capture — an inability to extract potentially valuable intelligence from terror suspects. They also highlight the futility of the war in Afghanistan by showing how the U.S. has poured vast resources into killing local insurgents, in the process exacerbating the very threat the U.S. is seeking to confront.
Find, Fix, Finish
These secret slides help provide historical context to Washington’s ongoing wars, and are especially relevant today as the U.S. military intensifies its drone strikes and covert actions against ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Those campaigns, like the ones detailed in these documents, are unconventional wars that employ special operations forces at the tip of the spear.
The “find, fix, finish” doctrine that has fueled America’s post-9/11 borderless war is being refined and institutionalized. Whether through the use of drones, night raids, or new platforms yet to be unleashed, these documents lay bare the normalization of assassination as a central component of U.S. counterterrorism policy.
“The military is easily capable of adapting to change, but they don’t like to stop anything they feel is making their lives easier, or is to their benefit. And this certainly is, in their eyes, a very quick, clean way of doing things. It’s a very slick, efficient way to conduct the war, without having to have the massive ground invasion mistakes of Iraq and Afghanistan,” the source said. “But at this point, they have become so addicted to this machine, to this way of doing business, that it seems like it’s going to become harder and harder to pull them away from it the longer they’re allowed to continue operating in this way.”
The articles in The Drone Papers were produced by a team of reporters and researchers from The Intercept that has spent months analyzing the documents. The series is intended to serve as a long-overdue public examination of the methods and outcomes of America’s assassination program. This campaign, carried out by two presidents through four presidential terms, has been shrouded in excessive secrecy. The public has a right to see these documents not only to engage in an informed debate about the future of U.S. wars, both overt and covert, but also to understand the circumstances under which the U.S. government arrogates to itself the right to sentence individuals to death without the established checks and balances of arrest, trial, and appeal.
Among the key revelations in this series:
How the president authorizes targets for assassination
Read more
Kill Chain
It has been widely reported that President Obama directly approves high-value targets for inclusion on the kill list, but the secret ISR study provides new insight into the kill chain, including a detailed chart stretching from electronic and human intelligence gathering all the way to the president’s desk. The same month the ISR study was circulated — May 2013 — Obama signed the policy guidance on the use of force in counterterrorism operations overseas. A senior administration official, who declined to comment on the classified documents, told The Intercept that “those guidelines remain in effect today.”
U.S. intelligence personnel collect information on potential targets, as The Intercept has previously reported, drawn from government watchlists and the work of intelligence, military, and law enforcement agencies. At the time of the study, when someone was destined for the kill list, intelligence analysts created a portrait of a suspect and the threat that person posed, pulling it together “in a condensed format known as a ‘baseball card.’” That information was then bundled with operational information and packaged in a “target information folder” to be “staffed up to higher echelons” for action. On average, it took 58 days for the president to sign off on a target, one slide indicates. At that point, U.S. forces had 60 days to carry out the strike. The documents include two case studies that are partially based on information detailed on baseball cards.
The system for creating baseball cards and targeting packages, according to the source, depends largely on intelligence intercepts and a multi-layered system of fallible, human interpretation. “It isn’t a surefire method,” he said. “You’re relying on the fact that you do have all these very powerful machines, capable of collecting extraordinary amounts of data and information,” which can lead personnel involved in targeted killings to believe they have “godlike powers.”
Assassinations depend on unreliable intelligence and hurt intelligence gathering
Read more
Firing Blind
In undeclared war zones, the U.S. military has become overly reliant on signals intelligence, or SIGINT, to identify and ultimately hunt down and kill people. The documents acknowledge that using metadata from phones and computers, as well as communications intercepts, is an inferior method of finding and finishing targeted people. They described SIGINT capabilities in these unconventional battlefields as “poor” and “limited.” Yet such collection, much of it provided by foreign partners, accounted for more than half the intelligence used to track potential kills in Yemen and Somalia. The ISR study characterized these failings as a technical hindrance to efficient operations, omitting the fact that faulty intelligence has led to the killing of innocent people, including U.S. citizens, in drone strikes.
The source underscored the unreliability of metadata, most often from phone and computer communications intercepts. These sources of information, identified by so-called selectors such as a phone number or email address, are the primary tools used by the military to find, fix, and finish its targets. “It requires an enormous amount of faith in the technology that you’re using,” the source said. “There’s countless instances where I’ve come across intelligence that was faulty.” This, he said, is a primary factor in the killing of civilians. “It’s stunning the number of instances when selectors are misattributed to certain people. And it isn’t until several months or years later that you all of a sudden realize that the entire time you thought you were going after this really hot target, you wind up realizing it was his mother’s phone the whole time.”
Within the special operations community, the source said, the internal view of the people being hunted by the U.S. for possible death by drone strike is: “They have no rights. They have no dignity. They have no humanity to themselves. They’re just a ‘selector’ to an analyst. You eventually get to a point in the target’s life cycle that you are following them, you don’t even refer to them by their actual name.” This practice, he said, contributes to “dehumanizing the people before you’ve even encountered the moral question of ‘is this a legitimate kill or not?’”
By the ISR study’s own admission, killing suspected terrorists, even if they are “legitimate” targets, further hampers intelligence gathering. The secret study states bluntly: “Kill operations significantly reduce the intelligence available.” A chart shows that special operations actions in the Horn of Africa resulted in captures just 25 percent of the time, indicating a heavy tilt toward lethal strikes.
Strikes often kill many more than the intended target
Read more
Manhunting in the Hindu Kush
The White House and Pentagon boast that the targeted killing program is precise and that civilian deaths are minimal. However, documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse.
“Anyone caught in the vicinity is guilty by association,” the source said. When “a drone strike kills more than one person, there is no guarantee that those persons deserved their fate. … So it’s a phenomenal gamble.”
The military labels unknown people it kills as “enemies killed in action”
Read more
Manhunting in the Hindu Kush
The documents show that the military designated people it killed in targeted strikes as EKIA — “enemy killed in action” — even if they were not the intended targets of the strike. Unless evidence posthumously emerged to prove the males killed were not terrorists or “unlawful enemy combatants,” EKIA remained their designation, according to the source. That process, he said, “is insane. But we’ve made ourselves comfortable with that. The intelligence community, JSOC, the CIA, and everybody that helps support and prop up these programs, they’re comfortable with that idea.”
The source described official U.S. government statements minimizing the number of civilian casualties inflicted by drone strikes as “exaggerating at best, if not outright lies.”
The number of people targeted for drone strikes and other finishing operations
Read more
Kill Chain
According to one secret slide, as of June 2012, there were 16 people in Yemen whom President Obama had authorized U.S. special operations forces to assassinate. In Somalia, there were four. The statistics contained in the documents appear to refer only to targets approved under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, not CIA operations. In 2012 alone, according to data compiled by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, there were more than 200 people killed in operations in Yemen and between four and eight in Somalia.
How geography shapes the assassination campaign
Read more
Firing Blind
In Afghanistan and Iraq, the pace of U.S. strikes was much quicker than in Yemen and Somalia. This appears due, in large part, to the fact that Afghanistan and Iraq were declared war zones, and in Iraq the U.S. was able to launch attacks from bases closer to the targeted people. By contrast, in Somalia and Yemen, undeclared war zones where strikes were justified under tighter restrictions, U.S. attack planners described a serpentine bureaucracy for obtaining approval for assassination. The secret study states that the number of high-value targeting operations in these countries was “significantly lower than previously seen in Iraq and Afghanistan” because of these “constraining factors.”
Even after the president approved a target in Yemen or Somalia, the great distance between drone bases and targets created significant challenges for U.S. forces — a problem referred to in the documents as the “tyranny of distance.” In Iraq, more than 80 percent of “finishing operations” were conducted within 150 kilometers of an air base. In Yemen, the average distance was about 450 kilometers and in Somalia it was more than 1,000 kilometers. On average, one document states, it took the U.S. six years to develop a target in Somalia, but just 8.3 months to kill the target once the president had approved his addition to the kill list.
Inconsistencies with White House statements about targeted killing
Read more
Kill Chain
The White House’s publicly available policy standards state that lethal force will be launched only against targets who pose a “continuing, imminent threat to U.S. persons.” In the documents, however, there is only one explicit mention of a specific criterion: that a person “presents a threat to U.S. interest or personnel.” While such a rationale may make sense in the context of a declared war in which U.S. personnel are on the ground in large numbers, such as in Afghanistan, that standard is so vague as to be virtually meaningless in countries like Yemen and Somalia, where very few U.S. personnel operate.
While many of the documents provided to The Intercept contain explicit internal recommendations for improving unconventional U.S. warfare, the source said that what’s implicit is even more significant. The mentality reflected in the documents on the assassination programs is: “This process can work. We can work out the kinks. We can excuse the mistakes. And eventually we will get it down to the point where we don’t have to continuously come back … and explain why a bunch of innocent people got killed.”
The architects of what amounts to a global assassination campaign do not appear concerned with either its enduring impact or its moral implications. “All you have to do is take a look at the world and what it’s become, and the ineptitude of our Congress, the power grab of the executive branch over the past decade,” the source said. “It’s never considered: Is what we’re doing going to ensure the safety of our moral integrity? Of not just our moral integrity, but the lives and humanity of the people that are going to have to live with this the most?”
Jeremy Scahill
✉[email protected]theintercept.com
[email protected]
E shame dhe cfare nuk thame per Enverin perse ndaloi fene me ligj. Paska patur shume te drejte sepse sic thuhet 68% e shqipetareve jane mazllem.
Kurse Sala na beri antare te organizates Islamike. Nuk ka nevoje per komente te tjera.
Merni kuranin dhe shkoni mu me pidh te kurves andej nga keni ardhe arabet e karit qe jeni gati 70% ne shqiperi. Kur do plase nje here e mire tu veme shqelmin tu perzeme andej nga keni ardhe. Myslimanet e Karit.
Vazhdo o cun vazhdo se fjale legenash vetem ke thon.nga cfare shpelle ke dale qe flet kaq bukur
Mire Islamiket qe nga Turqia deri ne Indi,nuk dine cfare eshte Demokraci,Liri,Lojera olimpike,Theatro.Po te Krishteret,harruat turen e druve?
Kush tha qe Toka eshte e rrumbullaket u dogj?
Po tani me shkaterrimin e vendeve dhe shteteve Arabe kush ka fajin,ai qe bombardon apo ai qe nuk i pret bombat mire?
Me Gadafin ishin shume mire,nje qind mije here me mire se ne Kube,por ja qe nuk ishte Katolike,me Sadamin qe i kishte ne rregull po tani ne Irak?
Rreth 1000.000 te vrare,Lufte civile dhe ku je akoma.
Keto nuk jane Bomba te Krishtera?
Po me Assadin kush u fut dhe filloi luften Civile?
Do thote dikush qe jane Diktatore keta.
Dhe pastaj?
Pse Mubaraku 45 vjet kukulla e Amerikaneve dhe Cifuteve nuk ishte diktatore?
Ju jini viktime e Propagandes dhe nuk dalloni Terroristat.
Ti, pis islamik kosovar qe shkruan keto rreshta, duhej te ishe sot,nene çizmen e serbit.
S’je faj ti,jo…
More Harram dhe Injorant i kategorise superiore: a e di ti qe ne Siri dhe Irak bombardon edhe Jordania, Mbreteria Saudite, Irani,Turqia, pervec te koalicionit perendimor kunder terrorizmit?
Terrorismi nuk ka fe more bishe.
Por shpelajne trurin kokepalareve si puna jote dhe i perdorin mish per top.
E di ti more HARRAM qe Gaddafi pagoi per te hedhur ne ere avionin me 250 njerez ne Skoci? Pse te duket cudi qe Sirianet u ngriten per te hedhur zgjedhen e Bashar AL Assad tej? E di ti more HARRAM qe Familia Assad ka zene rrenje ne Siri me keq se komunizmi ne Shqiperi?
Tere historia evidenton masakra dhe barbarizma te sundimtareve, qe per te zgjeruuar dhe zgjatur barbarizmat e tyre ndersejne nje popull ne emer te Perendise,Jehovahut, Allahut apo Birit te Perendise Krishtit me motivin se asgjesojne njerezit qe iu ka hyre Djalli ne Shpirt.
Aktualisht ndersehen njereez te stervktur ushtarakisht si terrriste kunder qytetgrimit gjoja e lidhur me Djallin, per te ruajtuur prapambetjen e masave te gjera per ti subduar me mire. Frika nga kercenimi i papritur nga e panjohura e lidhur me Perendine dhe Djallin i trullos njerezi dhe lehteson sundimin dhe pasurimin e sundimtareve,.
Fete kane qene dhe behen kur e do nevoja leva te kerkeave politike te sundimtareve. Sa me e prpambetur te jete nje shoqeri dhe sa me pak e njohur me kuptimin shkencor te botes, aq me te lehte e politika agresive te rekrutoj dhe ti stervis ushtarakisht fatkeqet per tu bere mish per sundimtaret, ne kete rast kamikaz . Kamikazi nuk behet ngase desheron, por se eshte rekrutuar dhe poqese s’pranon vritet si tradhetar i Allahut i korruotuar nga Djalli,ne Kur ka munguar terrori fetar ka dal terrori ideologjik si ai Nazist dhe ai Bolshevik. Tani kuptohet vetiu perse lulzon terrorizmi politik nen petkun fetar Islamik. Nuk duhet asgjesuar kamikazet, por Bushtra qe i pjell aty ku dergjet ne Kafazin e vet.
Ky eshte prezenca e shtetit Shqiptare !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nji shtet inexzistent i cili nuk ka asgje nen kontroll ,
ne ate vend ,as kriminelat politike ,as ata qe shetisin rrugeve si
qen rrugace ,as islamistet e xhamive ,as celulat e medias pushtuar nga islamiket ,as edhe islamistet -kafshet qe kane ndyre Librin Shqiptare ,
si kudo ne cdo institucion te artit-kultures .
Shtet prej kartoni ngelem perjetsishte deri kur nji dite tna vene flaken kta islamiste te qelbur
mos asht autori nji dr leshi rus shefshet krasniqi
O vellezer, une me emer jam i kesaj feje te urryer por asgje nuk me lidh me te, duhet te kthemei te gjithe ne kristiane sa nuk eshte vone, kam 25 qe nuk i pelqej kesaj feje asgje, asgje, dua te identifikhem ne katolik, edhe ne regjistrimin e fundit u deklarova katolik, le te mendojme per te ardhemen e femijeve tane, te kthehemi ne fene e te pareve tane ne katolik..ortodoks etj
O vellezer, une me emer jam i kesaj feje te urryer por asgje nuk me lidh me te, duhet te kthemei te gjithe ne kristiane sa nuk eshte vone, kam 25 qe nuk i pelqej kesaj feje asgje, asgje, dua te identifikhem ne katolik, edhe ne regjistrimin e fundit u deklarova katolik, le te mendojme per te ardhemen e femijeve tane, te kthehemi ne fene e te pareve tane ne katolik..ortodoks por Kurre me MYSLIMANE
Po kur je hajvan, doemos, vetem perkatesia fetare mund te identifikoje ne je Homo Sapiens i civilizuar, apo i sapo zbritur nga pema…
MOS u merrni me kuranin
Ajo eshte fjala e Zotit
Merruni me veten tuaj qe jeni
Pasardhesit e atyre qe gozhduan Jezu Krishtin
E meqe keni bere kete nuk lini Pune pa bere.
Shkodrani i vjeter
Therriste voven nr2 qe te zhdukte myslymanet.
A se di ai se vovat ja Jane q nenen
Populli te vet
Myslymani i devotshem nuk guxon ti beje dem as nje milingone.
Prandaj mjaft vollet vrer kot.
ti metje spermes qenerise allaut ,
nuk mundesh te jesh fierake kurr ,
prandaj mos e ndy ate emer Krenar.
sado me plehra te mbulohet ai vende ,
floriri do ndrricoj sepse ai nuk ndryshket kurre
dhe do ti sherbej shoqerise si vler
@ fietaku puro
E njeh mire rrethin e fierit
Apo vetem kaurret e lagjes?
Une nuk shava eas mallkova
Thjesht thashe nje te vertete
A se gozhduan ju Jezu krishtin
Ne fakt i hengret m.
Sepse nuk do te linte Zoti nje profet te tille ne dore te xhahilave
Ju oate ne kryq ate qe donit
Te shihnit,por jo jezu krishtin e vertete dhe kjo thuhet ne Kuranin qe ti e urren aq shume.
Ne kohen e Enverit qe dikush e perendi me lart ne i luteshim Zotit ne cdo rrenoje
Te shenjte qofte kishe apo xhami
Por vetem Zotit ama.